Sunday, November 27, 2005

Church Policies: Beginning of Life and Embryonic Stem Cell Research

This is part of a series of posts containing information on Church policies on medical and scientific issues.

Beginning of Human Life:

"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has no official position on the moment that human life begins."
As I recall, the Church Handbook of Instructions also contains the following quotation from Brigham Young, "...when the mother feels life come to her infant, it is the spirit entering the body preparatory to the immortal existence." I welcome correction or confirmation in the comments.

Embryonic Stem Cell Research:
"[T]he Church has not taken a position on the issue of embryonic stem-cell research."

The above statments are taken from Comments on the News.

Continue reading...

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Children Belong in Families

There is a brief article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that lends support to the importance of care given in infancy. The article is open acess, available here.

From PNAS:

Continue Reading


Alison Wismer Fries et al. report that a lack of typical care-giving in infancy is associated with altered oxytocin (OT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) neuropeptide systems during childhood. The researchers studied 18 children raised in foreign orphanages for an average of 16.6 months immediately after birth and then adopted by American families. The comparison control group consisted of 21 children raised by their biological parents in a typical American home environment. The children engaged in an interactive computer game for 30 min while sitting on the lap of their mother and also an unfamiliar female. Baseline and posttesting urine samples were taken to measure levels of OT and AVP. Children who had experienced early neglect had lower overall levels of AVP than did family-reared children. Also, OT levels for family-reared children increased after physical contact with their mothers, but children who experienced early neglect did not show a similar response. The data indicate that the AVP and OT pathways are affected by early social experience. These results are consistent with the view that early experience plays a critical role in the development of brain systems underlying basic aspects of human social behavior.

From news@nature.com:
Scientists stress that the longer-term effects of neglect on children and their hormones remain unclear. But the results after a few years are significant.

"We don't want to reach the conclusion that this difference is permanent," says Seth Pollak, a developmental psychopathologist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, who led the study. But he adds that the take-home message is that "children really need to be in families".

Pollak and his team measured the levels of two key hormones in 18 children adopted from Russian and Romanian orphanages. These resource-poor orphanages, where one adult may care for up to 40 infants, do not make it easy for newborns to form normal social attachments, says Pollak. The children left these orphanages about two or three years before the study, and have been living with adoptive parents in the United States.

The children, averaging 4.5 years in age, were asked to complete a 30-minute computer game while sitting on the laps of their adoptive mothers. The game directed children to engage with their mothers by, for example, tickling them or patting them on the head. For comparison, the researchers gave the same task to 21 Midwestern children who had been reared by their biological parents.

The researchers measured levels of oxytocin and vasopressin in urine samples before and after the game. Oxytocin has been nicknamed the trust hormone, and is known to facilitate social bonding in humans. The brain naturally produces the compound, and churns it out in certain situations, such as when being given a hug. Vasopressin has been shown to help animals recognize one another and bond.


A recent study found that people given a nasal spray containing oxytocin made them more willing to trust others with their money, which raises the possibility that maybe these kids could be helped by hormone treatment as they adjust to their new homes.

Continue reading...

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Welcome Tribune Readers! (If there are any.)

Saturday's Salt Lake Tribune had an article that listed a number of Mormon blogs.

Mormons jumped headlong into the world of blogging about three years ago. They created mini-communities organized around specific LDS topics such as history, politics or doctrine. Names like Times and Seasons, Approaching Zion, By Common Consent, Feminist Mormon Housewives, Millennial Star, Ministering Angels, Mormon Mommy Wars, Latter Day Liberation Front, LDS Science Review, and Mormon Metaphysics proliferated. (emphasis added)


I'm skeptical that I got much traffic from the article, but if you happen to be visiting as the result of it, welcome! Have a look around, feel free to drop me a line, and I hope you'll keep coming back.

Continue reading...

Thursday, November 17, 2005

The Buttars Collection

It looks like Utah Senator Chris Buttars will be in the news for some time to come. I am therefore collecting all of my posts on him here, listed in reverse chronological order. This page will be available on the sidebar as long as I deem appropriate.

Continue Reading


Buttars' Bill Defeated

Duane Jeffery on SB96

Buttars' Bill Passes House Commmittee 7-6

Sen. Buttars' Bill Looking Less Likely

Sen. Chris Buttars on KUER

Sen. Buttars' Bill Released

Buttars: Back in Black

Utah Board of Education Defies Buttars

Sen. Buttars in USA Today

Sen. Buttars: Doing Utah Proud

Sen. Buttars is Disowned by Discovery Institute

NCSE on Utah and ID

Oh No, Not in Utah

Continue reading...

Buttars: Back in Black

Chris Buttars has a bill on evolution, and he's not letting any of you jerks look at it until he's finished atheist-proofing it.

From the Deseret News:

A Utah senator says he has opened a confidential bill file challenging the State Board of Education's position on teaching evolution in public schools — a measure he'll unveil at the conservative Utah Eagle Forum's annual convention just days before the 2006 Legislature begins.

"I have it 'confidential' " — or shielded from public view — "and it's 'prioritized.' That means it will be heard," Sen. Chris Buttars, R-West Jordan, said Wednesday.

When asked if it would require intelligent design — an idea that life is so complex it can't be explained by Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and natural selection alone — to be taught in Utah public schools, Buttars said: "I'm not answering that yet. I certainly think it should. I believe with the president of the United States that intelligent design should have an equal position (in evolution lessons). But whether I do that in this bill this time, I'm not sure."

...[The] bill language will remain shielded from public view "until I'm satisfied that, one, the intent of the bill is clear, two, how it will be administered is also clear, and three, it can withstand a court challenge."

Here's my favorite part:
Utah Eagle Forum President Gayle Ruzicka praises Buttars' efforts. She asked Buttars to speak on the subject of evolution and intelligent design at the group's Jan. 14 convention. She said Buttars offered to unveil the bill at the same time.
I mean this with all sincerity and seriousness. From what I've seen from Buttars thus far, I am not confident that he could accurately summarize the claims and support for either evolution or intelligent design. But I will give him this bit of credit--it looks like he's talking about including ID in a philosophy or humanities class.

Continue reading...

Where There Is No Vision, the People Perish

PLoS Biology has a--well they call it a "feature." It's not really a primary article, nor is it a review article. I guess it's closest to a popular science article. Anyway, the article is "Jump-Starting a Cellular World: Investigating the Origin of Life, from Soup to Networks".

To some, the idea of an inorganic start to life is just silly--dismissed out of hand. If such a thing happened, we have a long way to go to understand it. Yet what has been done is tantalizing and adds to our understanding of the world, even if it does not explain life. One thing is for sure, we won't find it if we don't look for it. (Some people would prefer that, I'm sure.)

Continue reading...

John Pratt's Satanic Science

Justin Butterfield alerted me to John Pratt's latest article at Meridian Magazine titled, "Has Satan Hijacked Science?" The article describes the scientific method and then turns into an attack on materialism and the consequences that supposedly flow from it, such as: immorality, abortion, looting in the wake of hurricane Katrina, judicial decisions he disagrees with, and so forth. Of course evolution, though he never uses the word, is implied to be the chief bad-boy under the materialism umbrella. None of this is really that suprising. At least one of Pratt's previous articles was influenced by Phillip Johnson, and that seems apparent here as well. Johnson, of course, is the father of the latest intelligent design movement and is on an anti-materialist mission.

Continue Reading


The article makes assertions that have been dealt with elsewhere--I'll provide links. At first I was going to make a few arguments of my own, but I'm discarding them. I will just say that I think that this article will not improve people's understanding of science, rather it will breed mistrust of scientists and the scientific method.

I do want to highlight this passage:

How can Satan get away with avoiding the Scientific Method, while purporting to do science? He does it by focusing on the past and on the future, which are both areas beyond direct observation of the present, the realm of science.

Satan can fabricate all sorts of complete nonsense about the origins of the universe, the solar system, the earth and all of the creatures that live on it. None of these theories can be tested, but that does not stop him from proclaiming them as absolute truth.
There is a certain irony in the assertion that the past is not in the realm of science because much of Dr. Pratt's writing deals with using astronomical calendars to date biblical stories--religious chronology--and he occasionally uses retro-predictions to build support for his case. Is he discarding any notion that his chronologies are scientific? If not, why is his work different from that of the earth and life sciences?

Here are responses to just a few of the issues that Dr. Pratt raises.

First, is my defense of naturalistic assumptions in science.

The rest are from Talk.Origins:

Survival of the fittest implies might makes right.

Crime rates etc. have increased since evolution began to be taught.

Evolution teaches that we are animals and to behave as such.

Evolution has not been proved.

Evolution does not make predictions.

Interpreting evidence is not the same as observation.

Naturalistic science will miss a supernatural explanation.

Continue reading...

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Dusting of the Feet Over Dover

Eight out of nine school board members, of Dover, PA, were voted out and replaced with Democrats this week. Presumably, this is fallout over the intelligent design debacle. (Well, the judge hasn't rendered a decision yet, but many doubt it will go the school board's way.)

The Rev. Pat Robertson is not ammused.

"I’d like to say to the good citizens of Dover. If there is a disaster in your area, don’t turn to God, you just rejected Him from your city. And don’t wonder why He hasn’t helped you when problems begin, if they begin. I’m not saying they will, but if they do, just remember, you just voted God out of your city. And if that’s the case, don’t ask for His help because he might not be there."
(Watch the video clip if you don't believe it.)

I guess if there is a correlation between what it taught in science class and God's help during disasters, Kansas is the place to be. On the other hand, given the prevalence of tornados, that could be considered tempting God.

I wonder what the mormon-man-on-the-street-of-Dover take is on all of this.

Continue reading...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP