Tuesday, May 24, 2005

On the Number of New World Founders

Via Dienekes' Anthropology Blog I ran into this paper (On the Number of New World Founders: A Population Genetic Portrait of the Peopling of the Americas) with this commentary.

The sum up:

His [Jody Hey's] analysis suggests that only about 70 individuals left their ancestral Asian population, estimated at about 9,000 individuals, to reach America 7,000 to 14,000 years ago. Archeological evidence places the earliest American inhabitants in the New World at around 14,000 years ago. Though Hey’s estimates are more recent, they also indicate a high probability at this time period. Hey did not include genetic data from Eskimo-Aleut and Na Déne speakers, so the number of migrations was not addressed. But with this new approach, researchers will be able to explore this and many other questions to fill in the details of the first American immigration.


I'm not a population geneticist, so I'll leave it at that.

Update: Additional commentary at John Hawks Anthropology Weblog.

Continue reading...

Monday, May 23, 2005

The New Yorker on Intelligent Design

Philosophy of Biology alerted me to an excellent article in The New Yorker about the intelligent design movement. PofB declined to give any excerpts because the whole thing is worth reading. I agree, but I'll give a few excerpts. You can view it as a teaser, or pandering to couch potatoes too lazy to click a link and read a full article.

Continue Reading


First of all, intelligent design is not what people often assume it is. For one thing, I.D. is not Biblical literalism. Unlike earlier generations of creationists—the so-called Young Earthers and scientific creationists—proponents of intelligent design do not believe that the universe was created in six days, that Earth is ten thousand years old, or that the fossil record was deposited during Noah’s flood. (Indeed, they shun the label “creationism” altogether.) Nor does I.D. flatly reject evolution: adherents freely admit that some evolutionary change occurred during the history of life on Earth. Although the movement is loosely allied with, and heavily funded by, various conservative Christian groups—and although I.D. plainly maintains that life was created—it is generally silent about the identity of the creator.

The movement’s main positive claim is that there are things in the world, most notably life, that cannot be accounted for by known natural causes and show features that, in any other context, we would attribute to intelligence. Living organisms are too complex to be explained by any natural—or, more precisely, by any mindless—process. Instead, the design inherent in organisms can be accounted for only by invoking a designer, and one who is very, very smart.

********
It’s true that when you confront biologists with a particular complex structure like the flagellum they sometimes have a hard time saying which part appeared before which other parts. But then it can be hard, with any complex historical process, to reconstruct the exact order in which events occurred, especially when, as in evolution, the addition of new parts encourages the modification of old ones. When you’re looking at a bustling urban street, for example, you probably can’t tell which shop went into business first. This is partly because many businesses now depend on each other and partly because new shops trigger changes in old ones (the new sushi place draws twenty-somethings who demand wireless Internet at the café next door). But it would be a little rash to conclude that all the shops must have begun business on the same day or that some Unseen Urban Planner had carefully determined just which business went where.

********
As it happens, the idea that Darwinism is yoked to atheism, though popular, is also wrong. Of the five founding fathers of twentieth-century evolutionary biology—Ronald Fisher, Sewall Wright, J. B. S. Haldane, Ernst Mayr, and Theodosius Dobzhansky—one was a devout Anglican who preached sermons and published articles in church magazines, one a practicing Unitarian, one a dabbler in Eastern mysticism, one an apparent atheist, and one a member of the Russian Orthodox Church and the author of a book on religion and science.

Continue reading...

Friday, May 20, 2005

Amylase and the Power of Molecular Biology

In preparing for a presentation recently, I came across these two papers: (Here and here--the papers are old enough that they are available for free.) I think they are rather interesting, so I'm going to do my best to tell you about them in layman's terms, although it will help if you have a basic grasp of biology.

Amylase is an enzyme, made in the pancreas of all vertebrates, that helps to break down complex sugars. It is also made in the salivary glands of some mammals. The human genes that code for amylase have a interesting story to tell.

Continue Reading


This image is a schematic representation of the DNA just in front of the human amylase genes:



The first thing to note is that there are five genes: AMY1A, AMY1B, AMY1C, AMY2A, and AMY2B. The AMY1 genes are all expressed in the saliva. Only one representation accompanies them because they are all essentially the same. The AMY2 genes are expressed in the pancreas. However, the DNA in front of the two genes has some differences. Let's look at each structure in more detail.

AMY2B: The arrow at a right angle is showing where transcription starts, which means this is where the cellular machinary starts reading the genetic code for making the protein. It has a "Pan," indicating that this occurs in the pancreas. To the left is a shaded box labeled "gamma-actin". This is a pseudogene that inserted just in front of the amylase gene. (Pseudogenes are copies of genes that are re-inserted into the genome, but lose coding function due to mutation.) The letters and arrows underneath represent primers used in PCR--they need not concern us, so ignore them.

AMY1A/B/C: This schematic is similar to the one I just described. In this case, transcription starts a little upstream, and the "Sal" indicates expression in the saliva. The shaded box again indicates the presence of the gamma-actin pseduogene, but it has been interrupted by the insertion of an endogenous retrovirus. As part of their replication cycle, Retroviruses (such as HIV) integrate their genomes into the host genome and are flanked by Long Terminal Repeats (LTRs) when they do so. If the integration occurs in a germline cell, the viral genome will be passed on to progeny as part of the host genome. In other words, this viral genome is now part of your DNA. Over time, mutations occur which can disable the viral proteins. Evidently a retrovirus, whose proteins have likely lost function, integrated in the middle of the gamma-actin pseudogene.

AMY2A: This schematic is similar to the first two (this gene is expressed in the pancreas) except that most of the retrovirus is gone--there is just one LTR in its place. The two LTRs are made by the virus, and are identical to each other at integration. Because of this, sometimes homologous recombination between the integrated LTRs occurs which results in the removal of most of the viral genome, leaving only a solo LTR behind.

Now it is rather unlikely that a pseudogene would independently insert (5 times) in the same place in front of multiple amylase genes. Again, it is unlikely that a retrovirus would independently integrate (4 times) in to the same place in multiple actin pseudogenes. The most likely explanation for the pattern we see here is that there were duplication events within the genome.

This figure shows a proposed sequence of events (click to enlarge):



An actin pseudogene inserted in front of the original amylase gene. This new formation was duplicated within the genome. One of those is what we know as AMY2B. The other went through additional modifications. First was a deletion of part of the pseduogene (look at the first figure and you'll see that the pseudogene box is longest in AMY2B). Then the retrovirus inserted into the pseudogene and this formation was duplicated. In one case, the LTRs recombined to remove the viral genome, giving us AMY2A. In the other case there were two more duplications to give AMY1A/B/C. Using sequence differences between the five genes, estimates of the times of these events are given (mya = million years ago).

How do we know that the amylase gene did not start out with the actin pseudogene in front of it? Well the pseudogene is not present in other animals such as rodents or New World Monkeys (ie. American). This is shown in the next figure:



Squirrel monkeys are New World Monkeys and do not make amylase in their saliva--only the pancreas--which is why it is being compared with human AMY2B. There is no sign of the actin pseudogene in front of their amylase gene.

Now it gets interesting: New World Monkeys lack the pseudogene and do not make amylase in their saliva; Old World Monkeys have the pseudogene (one copy has a deletion) and do make amylase in their saliva; Apes and Humans also have the pseudogene, as well as the retrovirus, and they both make amylase in their saliva. This is represented in the following figure:



Noted in the figure is a portion of the retrovirus which is sufficient to target gene expression to the salivary glands (this has been done experimentally in mice) but it cannot account for all salivary amylase production because the Old World Monkeys also make amylase in their saliva.

These data are most consistent with the following scenario: Ancestral primates (and other mammals) simply had an amylase gene that was expressed in the pancreas. After New World Monkeys and Old World Monkeys diverged, the gamma-actin pseudogene inserted in front of the amylase gene and a duplication occured. In one of the copies a deletion occured in the pseudogene. After the Apes and Old World Monkeys diverged, a retrovirus integrated into the pseudogene in Apes, leaving Humans and Apes with similar structure in their amylase genes. (Look carefully and you can transfer in information of figures 2 and 4 onto one another.)

Remember I said that there are a few other animals that also make amylase in their saliva. This appears to be a feature that is independent from primates because the regulatory DNA responsible is totally different.

There are several lessons in all of this. First, none of this makes sense outside of the context of common descent. Second, it is an example of gene duplication--the geneology of genes within the genome--and their ability to take on slightly different functions as a result. (For another example, see here.) And third, it shows how pseudogenes and retroviruses can interact with and shape genomes, and that they are powerful markers of relationships.

Postscript: Just for fun, I went to the website that hosts the human genome, which is freely accessible. I was able to zoom in on the part of chromosome #1 that contains the amylase genes. On the left you can see a larger map of the chromsome. The amylase genes are just on the upper arm of the chromosome, toward the middle (centromere). On the right you can see the designation of the amylase genes I discussed. If I were to zoom in closer, I could look at the actual DNA sequence. Interestingly, there is something called "AMYP1". This is an amylase pseudogene--ie. a non-functional copy of one of the amylase genes, which means it is presumably "junk DNA".


Continue reading...

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Base Closings and AFIP

If you are not in the military, or do not professionally interact with the military, then the recent results of the Base Realignment and Closure 2005 probably passed by you unnoticed. A number of military bases will be closed or altered, and those in the nation's capital did not ecape.

Continue Reading


Walter Reed Army Hospital is going to be closed and transfered to the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, MD. NNMC will become the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. (I really, really hope they have traffic solutions in mind.) This will not be a simple transfer of operation; some of the programs currently at Walter Reed will be moved to other places.

One casualty in the process is the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP). According to a news report on the Science website (subscription proabably required),

...the pathology institute, with a current 820-member staff that includes about 120 scientists, would get lost in the shuffle. It began in 1862 as a museum for specimens from Civil War casualties. In 1946, Congress created AFIP, which specializes in diagnosing difficult disease cases for both military and civilian doctors. Its experts were "among the giants of pathology," and training there was "legend," says pathologist Fred Gorstein of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia. Recently, AFIP scientists fingered the virus that caused the 1918 pandemic influenza, identified victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and helped investigate the 2001 anthrax poisonings.
Staffers have known for a few years that DOD might close AFIP as part of efforts to eliminate civilian services, and some have moved on. Under the plan, only AFIP's renowned tissue repository and the flagship National Museum of Health and Medicine, with its displays on Civil War medicine and preserved body parts and fetuses, will remain. Diagnostic pathology tasks will be outsourced, and DOD will shift its DNA repository and forensics to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware [where the Columbia astronaut remains were identified].


I'm not sure where they intend to put that museum. I've been to it once--I can't imagine it gets much traffic. Let me just say, though, that it was a little creepy. Something about the lighting, the quiet, and exhibits on disease and deformities made the place feel a little strange. My wife told me about a ward leader who took the 11 year-old girls to the museum. I told her I didn't think that was a good idea. "That's what she said," my wife replied.

Continue reading...

Tuesday, May 17, 2005

Strong Drinks Were Good for the Body

This news article from National Geographic describes findings that suggest that ancient beer had a very modern benefit--antibiotics.

The [human] bones, the researchers say, contain traces of the antibiotic tetracycline. Today tetracycline is used to treat ailments ranging from acne flare-ups to urinary-tract infections. But the antibiotic only came into commercial use half a century ago. So how did tetracycline get into the Nubian bones?

Armelagos and his team say they found an answer in ancient beer. The brew was made from grain contaminated with the bacteria streptomycedes, which produces tetracycline.

Read the rest, if you are interested. As a side note, I think it is a mistake to retroactively apply the prohibitions of the Word of Wisdom on ancient civilizations. We don't need to make excuses for the ancients and their wine/strong drinks. The Word of Wisdom is particularly for our dispensation.

Continue reading...

A Correlated Viewpoint

Over at Mormons and Evolution we had a number of comments, and a guest post, from Gary Shapiro. We don't see eye to eye on everything, but his contributions were instructive. I already knew about his original website, but yesterday I discovered that he started a blog as well called No Death Before the Fall. I'm not sure if this represents a long-term committment to blogging or not.

Gary is certainly a champion of correlated Church publications. Whether you share Joseph Fielding Smith's views on science or not, you may want to keep tabs on his blog.

Continue reading...

Monday, May 16, 2005

Links to Light Up Your Eyes

Here are a couple of links that you may want to check out. First is a post at Pharyngula that gives a mini-lesson on the fossil and geological history of Kansas. The mini-lesson serves as a contrast to the recent antics over Kansas science education. He makes an interesting comparison, which I can personalize from my own experience. In former times I've toured prestigious natural history museums with an ill-informed attitude of, "well that's interesting, but they don't really know what they are talking about." Now my eyes increasingly light up at what I see. (Read the post, and you'll better understand what I'm saying.)

Then, via Pharyngula, there is an interesting 3-part mini-lesson on hominin (the lineage separating us from chimpanzees) evolution at Unscrewing the Inscrutable (Part 1, 2, and 3). In additon to the narrative there is some interesting comparative anatomy shown, including dental features (for you dentists out there), in each part.

Continue reading...

Sunday, May 15, 2005

The Intersection of Art and Science


While browsing CNN.com I found this story about illustrations possessed by the Smithsonian Institute. They have set up a web-gallery here. The site features a few illustrations, with more to come, as well as information about art preservation.

I'm not much of an artist (understatement), but for those of you interested in art and science, there just might be a career for you: paleontological illustration (see the website.)

Continue reading...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP