Behe Picks Up Other End of Stick
Michael Behe, of Darwin's Black Box fame, has a new book out titled The Edge of Evolution. I have not seen it yet--and frankly, I doubt I will read it--but critical reviews have been coming in, which I will link to below. Apparently, the gist of the book is that, in addition to re-iterating 'irreducibly complexity', Behe calculates the probability of a malaria drug resistance gene arising and uses that as the standard by which one can declare a mutation to have been designed or not. Or something like that.
It has long been apparent that if the argument of design is to be taken seriously, then it must apply to pathogens and parasites as well. Behe apparently takes that step with this quote:
Here's something to ponder long and hard: Malaria was intentionally designed. The molecular machinery with which the parasite invades red blood cells is an exquisitely purposeful arrangement of parts. C-Eve's children died in her arms because an intelligent agent deliberately made malaria, or at least something very similar to it.Well, at least he is consistent. (Of course, the designer of malaria need not be God; it could have been Satan. Take your pick. And welcome back to an age where diseases are caused by God's cursing or Satan's meddling.)
Anyway, here is some further reading:
Of cilia and silliness (more on Behe) - wherein Nick Matzke discovers the irony that malaria undercuts Behe's argument about the irreducible complexity of cilia.
Not for the faint of heart: the continuing dismemberment of Michael Behe - which contains links to a number of reviews.
See especially Sean Carroll's review in Science.


3 comments:
Malaria is associated with the Fall, not the Creation. The creation was paradisiacal. There was no mortality. Mortality (sickness and death) began for all forms of life when Adam fell.
Not to mention that malaria is a parasite of blood cells. ;)
Under such a scenario, I don't see how you can escape the conclusion that the Fall actually constitutes a new creation--particularly if one buys into the argument that adaptations are evidence of design.
You are correct! The Fall does constitute a new creation—the mortal creation.
"The Fall of Adam (and Eve) constituted the mortal creation and brought about the required changes in their bodies, including the circulation of blood and other modifications as well." (Russell M. Nelson, "The Atonement," Ensign, Nov. 1996, p. 33; italics in the original.)
Thorns, thistles and malaria are part of the mortal creation. (See Gen. 3:18; Moses 4:24).
Post a Comment