Saturday, January 21, 2017

Day 1: Official Propaganda Begins

On the first day of his presidency, Donald Trump's press secretary, Sean Spicer, called a press conference in order to berate the press for reporting that Trump's inauguration was not as well attended as Obama's. Not content to dispute the photographic evidence, Spicer made this false assertion:

"That was the largest audience to witness an inauguration, period. Both in person and around the globe."

And so it begins.

What to Expect: A constant stream of this kind of thing, and four years of attacks on media, science, and any other sources and institutions that don't go along with his narrative of greatness, or that attempt to hold him accountable. You can especially expect him to project on others his own liabilities. (Mark it, Elder Rigdon!)[1] Here's an example, also from Day 1:
“I have a running war with the media,” the commander-in-chief said. “They are among the most dishonest human beings on earth, right?”

Here is my warning and plea: Do not give your mind over to his efforts to delegitimize truth. You can like his policies. You can think he's better than Hillary or Obama. Whatever. But make him earn your trust! Don't take anything his administration says at face value. [I'm grabbing you by the lapels]...don't let him (and his acolytes) control your perception of truth. You will regret it.




Notes:
1. That's a playful use of Joseph Smith's emphasis in the King Follett discourse.



Continue reading...

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Obama Did a Really Crappy Job....

...of taking away our guns.

...of setting up death panels.

...of instituting Sharia law.

...of imposing martial law.

...of putting people into FEMA concentration camps.

...of turning us into a socialist country.

...of establishing a youth brown-shirt army.

...of letting the Muslim Brotherhood take over the country.

...of being the anti-Christ.

...of confiscating our IRAs and 401(k)s.

...of confiscating our gold.

...of getting rid of Christmas.

...of pressuring the elderly into having the plug pulled.

...of releasing Ebola into the country in order to...take away our guns.

...of conquering Texas in operation Jade Helm.

...of setting up Islamic terrorist training camps within the U.S.

...of seeking a third term.


Obama was so bad at doing these things that it's almost as if they were totally made up. And it's almost as if the people who believed and spread these ideas had no interest in their truth, were incapable of determining the truth, or wanted to profit from untruth.

Nah! It just demonstrates how incompetent he was!

So let us thank heaven that we are finally replacing him with someone competent and committed to truth, justice, and the American way[1].

I am obviously engaging in sarcasm here. I am not interested in arguing over the merits or demerits of Obama's presidency. My point is that if you indulged in any of the above, almost of all of which are 100% false, then you should re-think who you get your information from and the sources you trust.

Notes:
1. ...which pretty much consists of being a winner. Unless you are a loser. In which case you should probably find another country.



Continue reading...

Saturday, January 14, 2017

Joseph Fielding Smith and the Milk Mystery

I have a collection of draft posts in various phases of completion, most of which will probably never see the light of day. I was browsing through them and discovered that I had two involving--of all things--Joseph Fielding Smith and milk. Why let an odd combination like that go to waste? I've dusted them off and polished them up a bit. The first can be found here. Below is the second post.

Several years ago I was reading a story on Slate.com about cheese and thought of Joseph Fielding Smith. Let me explain.

When I read Man, His Origin and Destiny years ago, I noted a passage that struck me as odd. People pushing back against science often point to things that are not understood in order to highlight its limits--sometimes with the implication that those things are a mystery beyond science, and therefore the work of divinity. It is a common form of the 'god-of-the-gaps' argument.

In his book, President Joseph Fielding Smith identified some mysteries.

A scientist is able to understand the structure of a brain and the nervous system but who is able to tell whence comes a thought? What makes the heart beat? Why will two rose bushes only two feet apart, drawing nourishment from the same soil bear roses one deep red and the other pure white? Where and how comes the delicate coloring of the pansy or violet out of the same soil? Why are snow crystals always formed in six-pointed stars or sides, never in five or seven? One scientist has said that, "Water and sugar and the complex minerals which make the granite rocks all follow laws which are utterly unchangeable, but which are, as far as we can see, without any special reason: it is as profitable to speculate why the chlorophyll of vegetation is green and why the blood of animals is red. . . . Science knows why snow is white, and why it is beneficent; but it cannot explain the law of six." A black hen will lay a white egg and another hen either white or black will lay a brown egg. The eggs of some birds are blue, some are brown, some are white and some are speckled. William J. Bryan once said: why can "a black cow eat green grass and then give white milk with yellow butter in it?" Who can explain why these things are so? [Man, His Origin and Destiny, p. 14-15, bolding added]

Viewed from today's perspective, most of these questions have good answers. Probably the only question still standing is "whence comes a thought?"

William Jennings Bryan's question about cows, grass, and milk is particularly silly, and here's where Slate.com comes in, explaining why white milk becomes yellow cheese.

Beta carotene is a fat-soluble yellow pigment and antioxidant found in grass. After a cow chews the cud, beta-carotene dissolves into the animal’s fat stores and ends up in fat globules in its milk. However, protein clusters and the membranes that surround fat globules in milk conceal the pigment’s color, reflecting light in a way that makes milk appear white and opaque. But during the cheesemaking process, the pigment is released: After bacterial culture and rennet have been added to milk and the coagulated mixture is cooked, the fat membranes dissolve and the protein clusters loosen so they can’t reflect light anymore.

While the article addressed the color of cheese rather than butter, the answer is basically the same. And just for the sake of completeness, grass is green because it contains chlorophyll, which is a poor absorber of green light, and the cow is black because it produces light-absorbing melanin in the hair and skin.

Another mystery solved by science!


Continue reading...

Friday, January 06, 2017

Shaping History: Joseph Fielding Smith Milks a Cow

I have a collection of draft posts in various phases of completion, most of which will probably never see the light of day. I was browsing through them and discovered that I had two involving--of all things--Joseph Fielding Smith and milk. Why let an odd combination like that go to waste? So with that as an introduction, I'll post the first one below, and the second in a following post.

The historicity of the scriptures is a never-ending topic of discussion (and sometimes contention). Some argue that ancient writers shaped their stories to theological ends. This gives me an excuse to share a small but concrete example of history-shaping in the life of Joseph Fielding Smith that I discovered a couple of years ago.

I happened to teach a Primary lesson (Lesson 39: I Can Follow Jesus Christ by Serving Others) that contains the following story about Joseph Fielding Smith.

“It was so dark that the sleepy seven-year-old boy could hardly find his way down the path to the barn. He had planned for days how he could get out of bed, dress, creep quietly down the stairs, take the milking bucket from the pantry shelf, and leave the house without waking anyone.

“… [Joseph] had seen his sister, Mary, milk the cow many times. He found it wasn’t as easy as he thought it would be. … Before long his fingers and wrists ached. He had to stop often to rest them. …

“The boy was so intent on milking that he did not realize how long it had taken, and was surprised to find that daylight had come … when he finally left the barn and started for the house. As he entered the kitchen, Mother looked up from the stove where she was preparing breakfast, and asked, ‘Why, Joseph, what have you been doing so early in the morning?’

“He held up the filled milk bucket in answer, and felt a warm rush of joy at his mother’s smile of approval. ‘Well,’ she said, ‘since it seems you are big enough, milking each morning will be your job.’ She paused and then questioned, ‘But why is it you were so anxious to milk that cow?’

“Joseph lifted an earnest face to his mother as he answered, ‘I just want to help while Father is on his mission. And you see, [Mary] has so many other things to do, I thought if I could take care of the morning milking, she wouldn’t have to worry about that!’

“… His mother put her arms around him and held him close as she said, ‘How pleased your father will be when I write and tell him that he has a fine young man to take care of milking the cow while he is away!’” (Lucile C. Reading, “The Morning Chore,” Children’s Friend, Apr. 1970, p. 23).

Later in the year I recognized this same episode in the Priesthood/Relief Society manual (Chapter 23: Individual Responsibility of the Teachings).

Joseph Fielding Smith learned to work when he was a young boy. His father was often away from home, so “he spent much of his childhood doing the work of an adult.” In fact, he was such a diligent worker that he “unwittingly inherited one job earlier than he need have, when in boyish pride he secretly milked one of the family cows to prove he was capable of doing it, and thus was assigned the job permanently.”

In the first story we have a boy selflessly serving his sister and taking on an extra duty. In the second, it's a boy trying to prove his ability and unwittingly getting stuck with the job. Which one best represents the truth?

The two stories are not incompatible per se, but it seems clear that the writers of each manual had a different purpose in mind with slightly different character traits that they wanted to highlight. It's a simple example of history being shaped to make a point.

For what it's worth, in the contest of 'boyish pride' versus 'help my sister', my money is on 'boyish pride'.




Continue reading...

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP